10 free Pre-Flight Reviews now open

Claim Firewall for High-Stakes AI Outputs

AI output should not becometrusted output by default.

QEL breaks drafts into claims, maps them to evidence, applies rule packs, and keeps unsupported or review-required claims out of final output.

Apply for a Pre-Flight Review See how the firewall works

Synthetic, public, or redacted workflows only. No sensitive documents.

Opening 10 free QEL Pre-Flight Reviews

Get a claim map, evidence map, decision table, review appendix, survived output, and audit summary for one synthetic/redacted workflow.

Synthetic/redacted only No sensitive docs Not legal advice Not compliance certification Human review stays in control

Claim Firewall ConsoleLeakage: 0

Raw Draft

AI claimpolicy claim

Extracted Claims

supportedneeds caveatunsupportedreview required

Evidence / Rules

source span mapped

wrong source blocked

review queue routed

Output Firewall

final-output gate

Survived Output

Only admitted or caveated claims pass.

Blocked and review-required claims stop here.

registry allowed

claim map readyevidence map readyaudit/provenance ready

8synthetic stress scenarios

55material claims tested

0final-output leakage

0blocked/review-required claims in survived output

Opening limited QEL Pre-Flight Reviews

Send one synthetic, public, or redacted workflow. Get a claim-admission report back.

QEL returns a structured review showing what is admitted, caveated, blocked, review-required, and missing evidence.

Claim map

Material claims extracted from the workflow.

Evidence map

Sources and source spans tied to claims.

Rule-pack decisions

Admission, caveat, block, or review-required.

Missing-evidence register

What needs support before trust.

Survived output

Final text only from allowed claims.

Review appendix

Stopped claims with reasons.

Audit/provenance summary

Deterministic trail for the review.

Apply for a slot

The last-mile problem

The failure is not only hallucination. It is unsupported claims surviving.

AI-generated work is becoming vendor reviews, governance memos, legal/policy drafts, board packets, compliance summaries, audit reports, and AI approval packets. They sound confident before they are supported.

Overbroad vendor claims

A vendor says customer data is never used for training. QEL checks policy, exceptions, and caveats.

Missing evidence

A summary sounds complete but lacks the source record needed for final output.

Wrong source type

A sales page is not enough support for a governed AI-risk claim.

Stale support

Old evidence can require caveat or review before reuse.

Legal/compliance review needed

QEL routes sensitive conclusions to review instead of admitting them.

Unsupported final summaries

Final output cannot inherit claims that failed admission.

How QEL works

AI can draft. QEL decides what survives.

Extract material claims

Drafts become reviewable claim records.

Map evidence and source spans

Claims point to the records that support or fail them.

Apply rule packs

Source type, caveat, review, and exclusion rules are deterministic.

Decide status

Admitted, caveated, blocked, or review-required.

Compile survived output

Only allowed claims can enter final text.

Preserve audit trail

The review produces an artifact, not vibes.

Synthetic controlled proof

Final output only from admitted or caveated claims.

Synthetic controlled evaluations only. Not legal advice. Not compliance certification. Not production approval.

8synthetic legal stress scenarios

55material claims tested

0final-output leakage

0blocked claims in final output

0review-required claims in final output

0legal conclusions admitted without review

Legal extraction benchmark, default deterministic path

38 extracted candidates. 22 of 24 gold material claims matched. 0.86 F1. LLM assistance skipped by default.

Where Pre-Flight Reviews fit

Built for high-stakes workflow owners.

Vendor AI Claim Review

Risky claim: We do not train on customer data.

QEL checks: source, policy, exception, caveat, review routing

Artifact: admitted/caveated/blocked decision

AI Governance Approval Packets

Risky claim: This use case is fully approved.

QEL checks: approval record, owner, risk tier, missing evidence

Artifact: review appendix

Legal / Policy Memo Review

Risky claim: The policy satisfies all requirements.

QEL checks: legal conclusion routing, support, caveat

Artifact: claim-admission table

GRC / Compliance Summaries

Risky claim: All controls are operating effectively.

QEL checks: control evidence, stale records, source type

Artifact: evidence map

Internal Audit Reports

Risky claim: No material gaps remain.

QEL checks: finding closure, proof record, reviewer route

Artifact: survived summary

Board / Nonprofit Proposal Review

Risky claim: The project is ready for approval.

QEL checks: bylaws, budget, vote path, missing evidence

Artifact: board-ready summary

Procurement / Contract Risk

Risky claim: The vendor indemnifies all AI harms.

QEL checks: contract clause, caveat, review routing

Artifact: blocked/review appendix

Agentic Workflow Readiness

Risky claim: The agent can act without human review.

QEL checks: rule pack, escalation, final-action boundary

Artifact: readiness register

FLAGSHIP SYNTHETIC WORKFLOWS

One claim firewall. Three high-stakes document workflows.

QEL applies the same final-output governance pattern across clinical/regulatory writing, financial-services documents, and insurance/legal assertions: extract claims, map evidence, apply configurable rule packs, compile survived output from admitted registry records, and preserve everything else in review and audit artifacts.

3 synthetic workflows 3 configurable rule packs 78 candidate claims reviewed 0 final-output leakage blocked/review-required claims excluded from survived output

Controlled synthetic demos only. Not legal, medical, investment, insurance, regulatory, or compliance advice. Not production approval.

Life Sciences / PharmaLeakage 0

Clinical Study Report Review

Review a synthetic CSR narrative where efficacy, safety, subgroup, and regulatory-readiness claims must trace to tables, listings, protocol/SAP excerpts, and analysis traceability maps.

Rule pack: Synthetic FDA CSR Traceability Pack

full synthetic CSR PDFevidence packetclaim admission reportregistry-gated survived output

26 claimsLeakage 0Source-span mappingReview gates

View workflow

Financial Services / Investment BankingLeakage 0

Investment Memo Review

Review a synthetic investment memo where revenue growth, non-GAAP metrics, market claims, ESG language, peer comparisons, and forecast assumptions must map back to filings, model tabs, reconciliations, and source assumptions.

Rule pack: Synthetic SEC / Investment Memo Claim Support Pack

full synthetic investment memo PDFfinancial evidence packetclaim admission reportregistry-gated survived output

26 claimsLeakage 0Non-GAAP checksMarket-claim controls

View workflow

Legal / Insurance ClaimsLeakage 0

Insurance Coverage Review

Review a synthetic coverage determination where policy, exclusion, timeline, expert, denial, and legal assertion claims must map to exact policy clauses, claim-file facts, expert report spans, and review gates.

Rule pack: Synthetic Insurance Coverage Determination Pack

full synthetic coverage PDFpolicy/source packetclaim admission reportregistry-gated survived output

26 claimsLeakage 0Policy-span checksLegal review gates

View workflow

Want QEL to test a workflow like this?

Apply for a QEL Pre-Flight Review

Why not general AI review?

Generic AI can summarize. QEL controls what survives.

Prompt-based AI review

narrative critique
prompt-dependent
no fixed admission record
unsupported language can be copied forward

QEL

claim table
evidence map
rule-pack decisions
blocked/review appendix
survived output only from admitted/caveated claims
audit/provenance summary

What you receive

Your Pre-Flight Review Package

1 workflow processed

claim-admission report

evidence and missing-evidence map

blocked/review-required appendix

survived output comparison

20-minute walkthrough

workflow-fit recommendation

Apply

Apply for a QEL Pre-Flight Review

Use this form to describe a synthetic, public, or redacted workflow. Do not submit confidential, privileged, PHI, regulated, or sensitive documents.

This form collects contact and workflow metadata only. Do not submit sensitive documents.

Full name Work email LinkedIn URL Organization Role / function Workflow type What workflow do you want to pressure-test?

Can you provide synthetic, public, or redacted materials? Yes Not yet

Preferred next step I understand this application should not include confidential, privileged, PHI, regulated, or sensitive documents.

No files. No document upload. Contact metadata only.

If the form does not submit, email the same information to suleiman@qualifiedevidencelayer.com.

FAQ

Direct answers before you apply.

What is QEL?

QEL is a claim-admission and evidence-governance layer for high-stakes AI and drafted outputs.

Is this legal advice?

No. QEL produces review artifacts and does not provide legal advice.

Is this compliance certification?

No. QEL does not certify compliance or regulatory readiness.

Can I upload sensitive documents?

No. The application form accepts metadata only. Pre-Flight Reviews use synthetic, public, or redacted materials after scope is agreed.

What workflows are best?

AI governance packets, vendor claims, GRC summaries, legal/policy drafts, audit reports, board packets, procurement and contract reviews.

How is this different from general AI review?

Generic AI can summarize. QEL creates a claim-admission record and controls what enters survived output.

What do I get back?

Claim map, evidence map, decisions, missing evidence, survived output, appendix, and audit/provenance summary.

What does a pilot look like?

A controlled workflow review that determines whether QEL maps to your team's governance pain.

Is it a production deployment?

No production deployment claim is made. The Pre-Flight Review is a controlled evaluation.